View attached explanation and answer. Let me know if you have any questions.
THE CASE OF THE POLITICALLY INCORRECT SIGN
Question 1
Eriq has stronger arguments. This is because while the city’s attorney argued that they have the
authority to regulate the signs within its borders they do not have the authority to regulate what
individuals can erect in their private property. Furthermore, the regulation infringes on the
freedom of speech of the city’s residents and the arguments presented by the latter at the trial fail
to convince their reasons for doing so. Moreover, where an argument is presented in a case not
only should the witnesses of a party bring out the key arguments but also the party involved in
the case itself.
Question 2
The laws applicable here are the sign standards and signage regulations in line with
environmental law. The appli…
15 Million Students Helped!
Create Account to order
