10:47 PM Tue Dec 7
13% 0
기
Assignment Details
BUS-028A-70066 Business Law |
Extra Credit Assignment
O pts 0 Not Submitted
Due
Dec 10, 2021 at 11:59 PM
Submission Types
File Upload
Submission & Rubric
>
Description
Read Chapter 25
Complete the following Case Studies (Pg 724-25)
25-1: Doing Business Internationally. Macrotech, Inc., develops an innovative computer chip and obtains a
patent on it. The firm markets the chip under the trademarked brand name “Flash.” Macrotech wants to sell
the chip to Nitron, Ltd., in Pacifica, a foreign country. Macrotech is concerned, how-ever, that after an initial
purchase Nitron will duplicate the chip, pirate it, and sell the pirated version to computer manufacturers in
Pacifica. To avoid this possibility, Macrotech could establish its own manufacturing facility in Pacifica, but it
does not want to do this. How can Macrotech, without establishing a manufacturing facility in Pacifica,
protect Flash from being pirated by Nitron? (See Doing Business Internationally.)
25–3. Sovereign Immunity. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc., designs, makes, and sells helicopters with
distinctive and famous trade dress that identifies them as Bell aircraft. Bell also owns the helicopters’
design patents. Bell’s Model 206 Series includes the Jet Ranger. Thirty-six years after Bell developed the
Jet Ranger, the Islamic Republic of Iran began to make and sell counterfeit Model 206 Series helicopters
and parts. Iran’s counterfeit versions—the Shahed 278 and the Shahed 285-used Bell’s trade dress. The
Shahed aircraft was promoted at an international air show in Iran to aircraft customers. Bell filed a suit in a
U.S. district court against Iran, alleging violations of trademark and patent laws. Is Iran-a foreign nation-
exempt in these circumstances from the jurisdiction of U.S. courts? Explain. [Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. V.
Islamic Republic of Iran, 734 F.3d 1175.
25-6. The Principle of Comity. Holocaust survivors and the heirs of Holocaust victims filed a suit in a
federal district court in the United States against the Hungarian national railway, the Hungarian national
bank, and several private Hungarian banks. The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants had participated in
expropriating the property of Hungarian Jews who were vic-tims of the Holocaust. The claims arose from
events in Hungary seventy years ago. The plaintiffs had not exhausted remedies available through
Hungarian courts. Indeed, they had not even attempted to seek remedies in Hungarian courts, and they did
not provide a legally compelling reason for their failure to do so. The defendants asked the court to dismiss
Submit Assignment
Dashboard
19
0= To Do
DOO
Calendar
000
Notifications
Inbox
0=
10:48 PM Tue Dec 7
13% 0
K
기
Assignment Details
BUS-028A-70066 Business Law |
25-1: Doing Business Internationally. Macrotech, Inc., develops an innovative computer chip and obtains a
patent on it. The firm markets the chip under the trademarked brand name “Flash.” Macrotech wants to sell
the chip to Nitron, Ltd., in Pacifica, a foreign country. Macrotech is concerned, how-ever, that after an initial
purchase Nitron will duplicate the chip, pirate it, and sell the pirated version to computer manufacturers in
Pacifica. To avoid this possibility, Macrotech could establish its own manufacturing facility in Pacifica, but it
does not want to do this. How can Macrotech, without establishing a manufacturing facility in Pacifica,
protect Flash from being pirated by Nitron? (See Doing Business Internationally.)
25–3. Sovereign Immunity. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc., designs, makes, and sells helicopters with
distinctive and famous trade dress that identifies them as Bell aircraft. Bell also owns the helicopters’
design patents. Bell’s Model 206 Series includes the Jet Ranger. Thirty-six years after Bell developed the
Jet Ranger, the Islamic Republic of Iran began to make and sell counterfeit Model 206 Series helicopters
and parts. Iran’s counterfeit versions—the Shahed 278 and the Shahed 285-used Bell’s trade dress. The
Shahed aircraft was promoted at an international air show in Iran to aircraft customers. Bell filed a suit in a
U.S. district court against Iran, alleging violations of trademark and patent laws. Is Iran-a foreign nation-
exempt in these circumstances from the jurisdiction of U.S. courts? Explain. [Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. v.
Islamic Republic of Iran, 734 F.3d 1175.
25-6. The Principle of Comity. Holocaust survivors and the heirs of Holocaust victims filed a suit in a
federal district court in the United States against the Hungarian national railway, the Hungarian national
bank, and several private Hungarian banks. The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants had participated in
expropriating the property of Hungarian Jews who were vic-tims of the Holocaust. The claims arose from
events in Hungary seventy years ago. The plaintiffs had not exhausted remedies available through
Hungarian courts. Indeed, they had not even attempted to seek remedies in Hungarian courts, and they did
not provide a legally compelling reason for their failure to do so. The defendants asked the court to dismiss
the suit. Does the principle of comity support the defendants’ request? Explain. Fischer v. Magyar
Államvasutak Zrt.
Submit Assignment
19
0= To Do
Dashboard
םםם
000
Calendar
Notifications
Inbox
0=
10:48 PM Tue Dec 7
13% 0
기
Assignment Details
BUS-028A-70066 Business Law |
Homework Assignment for Chapter 21
10 pts Not Submitted
Due
Dec 10, 2021 at 11:59 PM
Submission Types
File Upload
Submission & Rubric
>
Description
Issue Spotters Pg 626
Answer Questions #1 & #2
1. Under what circumstances would Pop’s Market, a small store in a small, isolated town, be considered a
monopolist? If Pop’s is a monopolist, is it in violation of Section 2 of the Sherman Act? Why or why not?
2. Maple Corporation conditions the sale of its syrup on buyers’ agreement to buy Maple’s pancake mix.
What factors would a court consider to decide whether this arrangement violates the Clayton Act?
Submit Assignment
19
0= To Do
Dashboard
םםם
000
Calendar
Notifications
Inbox
0=
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
13% 0
기
Assignment Details
BUS-028A-70066 Business Law |
Extra Credit Assignment
O pts 0 Not Submitted
Due
Dec 10, 2021 at 11:59 PM
Submission Types
File Upload
Submission & Rubric
>
Description
Read Chapter 25
Complete the following Case Studies (Pg 724-25)
25-1: Doing Business Internationally. Macrotech, Inc., develops an innovative computer chip and obtains a
patent on it. The firm markets the chip under the trademarked brand name “Flash.” Macrotech wants to sell
the chip to Nitron, Ltd., in Pacifica, a foreign country. Macrotech is concerned, how-ever, that after an initial
purchase Nitron will duplicate the chip, pirate it, and sell the pirated version to computer manufacturers in
Pacifica. To avoid this possibility, Macrotech could establish its own manufacturing facility in Pacifica, but it
does not want to do this. How can Macrotech, without establishing a manufacturing facility in Pacifica,
protect Flash from being pirated by Nitron? (See Doing Business Internationally.)
25–3. Sovereign Immunity. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc., designs, makes, and sells helicopters with
distinctive and famous trade dress that identifies them as Bell aircraft. Bell also owns the helicopters’
design patents. Bell’s Model 206 Series includes the Jet Ranger. Thirty-six years after Bell developed the
Jet Ranger, the Islamic Republic of Iran began to make and sell counterfeit Model 206 Series helicopters
and parts. Iran’s counterfeit versions—the Shahed 278 and the Shahed 285-used Bell’s trade dress. The
Shahed aircraft was promoted at an international air show in Iran to aircraft customers. Bell filed a suit in a
U.S. district court against Iran, alleging violations of trademark and patent laws. Is Iran-a foreign nation-
exempt in these circumstances from the jurisdiction of U.S. courts? Explain. [Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. V.
Islamic Republic of Iran, 734 F.3d 1175.
25-6. The Principle of Comity. Holocaust survivors and the heirs of Holocaust victims filed a suit in a
federal district court in the United States against the Hungarian national railway, the Hungarian national
bank, and several private Hungarian banks. The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants had participated in
expropriating the property of Hungarian Jews who were vic-tims of the Holocaust. The claims arose from
events in Hungary seventy years ago. The plaintiffs had not exhausted remedies available through
Hungarian courts. Indeed, they had not even attempted to seek remedies in Hungarian courts, and they did
not provide a legally compelling reason for their failure to do so. The defendants asked the court to dismiss
Submit Assignment
Dashboard
19
0= To Do
DOO
Calendar
000
Notifications
Inbox
0=
10:48 PM Tue Dec 7
13% 0
K
기
Assignment Details
BUS-028A-70066 Business Law |
25-1: Doing Business Internationally. Macrotech, Inc., develops an innovative computer chip and obtains a
patent on it. The firm markets the chip under the trademarked brand name “Flash.” Macrotech wants to sell
the chip to Nitron, Ltd., in Pacifica, a foreign country. Macrotech is concerned, how-ever, that after an initial
purchase Nitron will duplicate the chip, pirate it, and sell the pirated version to computer manufacturers in
Pacifica. To avoid this possibility, Macrotech could establish its own manufacturing facility in Pacifica, but it
does not want to do this. How can Macrotech, without establishing a manufacturing facility in Pacifica,
protect Flash from being pirated by Nitron? (See Doing Business Internationally.)
25–3. Sovereign Immunity. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc., designs, makes, and sells helicopters with
distinctive and famous trade dress that identifies them as Bell aircraft. Bell also owns the helicopters’
design patents. Bell’s Model 206 Series includes the Jet Ranger. Thirty-six years after Bell developed the
Jet Ranger, the Islamic Republic of Iran began to make and sell counterfeit Model 206 Series helicopters
and parts. Iran’s counterfeit versions—the Shahed 278 and the Shahed 285-used Bell’s trade dress. The
Shahed aircraft was promoted at an international air show in Iran to aircraft customers. Bell filed a suit in a
U.S. district court against Iran, alleging violations of trademark and patent laws. Is Iran-a foreign nation-
exempt in these circumstances from the jurisdiction of U.S. courts? Explain. [Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. v.
Islamic Republic of Iran, 734 F.3d 1175.
25-6. The Principle of Comity. Holocaust survivors and the heirs of Holocaust victims filed a suit in a
federal district court in the United States against the Hungarian national railway, the Hungarian national
bank, and several private Hungarian banks. The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants had participated in
expropriating the property of Hungarian Jews who were vic-tims of the Holocaust. The claims arose from
events in Hungary seventy years ago. The plaintiffs had not exhausted remedies available through
Hungarian courts. Indeed, they had not even attempted to seek remedies in Hungarian courts, and they did
not provide a legally compelling reason for their failure to do so. The defendants asked the court to dismiss
the suit. Does the principle of comity support the defendants’ request? Explain. Fischer v. Magyar
Államvasutak Zrt.
Submit Assignment
19
0= To Do
Dashboard
םםם
000
Calendar
Notifications
Inbox
0=
10:48 PM Tue Dec 7
13% 0
기
Assignment Details
BUS-028A-70066 Business Law |
Homework Assignment for Chapter 21
10 pts Not Submitted
Due
Dec 10, 2021 at 11:59 PM
Submission Types
File Upload
Submission & Rubric
>
Description
Issue Spotters Pg 626
Answer Questions #1 & #2
1. Under what circumstances would Pop’s Market, a small store in a small, isolated town, be considered a
monopolist? If Pop’s is a monopolist, is it in violation of Section 2 of the Sherman Act? Why or why not?
2. Maple Corporation conditions the sale of its syrup on buyers’ agreement to buy Maple’s pancake mix.
What factors would a court consider to decide whether this arrangement violates the Clayton Act?
Submit Assignment
19
0= To Do
Dashboard
םםם
000
Calendar
Notifications
Inbox
0=
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
