View attached explanation and answer. Let me know if you have any questions.
1
Contract law Cases
Name
Institution Affiliation
Course Name
Instructor
2
Contract law Cases
Case Example 4-6
Yes, I agree with the Judges’ interpretation of the term “prohibits access.” The reason
being, in this case, the language of the contract was not clear. For instance, the contract’s
language is unclear, and the court must consider it a matter of law.
I believe that the narrow definition of the term leads to fair and just results in this case for
both parties. The contracting parties should have stated the terms of their contract clearly and
without ambiguity (Chapter 4, n.d.). If the contract had been carefully drafted, they could have
avoided such lawsuits. On the contrary, the language in their agreement left room for debate as to
its meaning.
The clause might read to favor the hotel’s interpretation by stating it as a mutual mistake.
The reason is, since the plaintiff and the defendant never had a meeting of the minds, either of
them is allowed to withdraw without any liability.
Example Case 4-12
The court did not impose punitive damages since the hotel assisted the plaintiffs (guests)
in finding a space at the second hotel. Secondly, the hotel was justified to overbook guests. It is
prevalent for guests wh…
15 Million Students Helped!
Create Account to order
